Prof. Theresa MacPhail
Draper Map Room
Prof. Steven Moga
Draper Map Room
the time between rulers; a space between; the gap after one epoch ends and another begins; the tumultuous and exciting period after scholarly boundaries become fluid and before new academic disciplines are fully defined; the blog of New York University's Draper Program
Draper student, Chris Iverson, took some detailed notes at Draper's recent MA Thesis Workshop that he was kind enough to share. We hope they will be helpful to many of you.
You'll see that both Steve and Theresa, who led the workshop, mention that Draper has a collection of award-winning and -nominated theses. It's true! We do! If you haven't heard of or seen it yet, please feel free to come take a look. The theses are housed in rm 107 and are available to browse during office hours (M-F, 9-5). You can read them at Draper or check a couple out for a week or so. As Steve and Theresa point out, this can be a great resource when it comes to writing/formulating your own thesis.
If anyone has additional notes from this workshop that they'd be willing to share, we'd love to post them to the listserv in addition to Chris's excellent overview, below.
Please email notes to draper.program@nyu.edu.
-------
Draper Thesis Workshop 2/24/12
· Draper has a collection of award-winning and -nominated theses to read.
o This might help with format.
· A thesis topic should relate to where you’ve been and/or where you are going.
o Draw on previous research or design the thesis to help in future work.
· Three starting points might help when considering a topic:
o Method/methodology
o Data/types of sources
o Theory
Steve Moga’s Talking Points
· Pick something that motivates you.
o If your topic does not interest you, this will be painful.
· Write all the way through.
o Do not collect data and wait to write. You may forget some context or lose steam.
· Be in communication with your advisor.
· Think about the thesis in the simplest possible way (elevator speech). It helps to think about a title to keep on track.
· In the planning stages, it helps to set a deadline and work backwards. This is a way to get an vision of what the finished thesis should look like and break it up into more doable parts.
Theresa MacPhail’s Talking Points
· Writing is thinking.
o Freewriting is a valuable parctice when “stuck.”
o Idea mapping gives the material a physical dimension.
· Reverse outlining can help organize
o Taking a written passage and notating the margins can help find the stucture hidden in a written text. This allows for organizing at a basic level .
· Do not start at the beginning!
o The thesis or topic may not become clear until the bulk of the paper is written and organized.
· Look at other papers and “steal” the format.
o Like, for example, see Draper's collection of award-winning and -nominated theses.
· Have a friend or other educated reader take a look at the text to make sure that it does what you want it to do. If another intelligent reader cannot follow the logic, then it may not be organized properly.
· Write a one-sentence thesis statement to help simplify the idea that will make the core of the argument.
· Don’t be afraid to “kill your babies.” In other words, you may have to delete blocks of great text if they prove tangential and do not return to your topic.
o A way to make this less painful is to cut and paste “outtakes” into another file so thay are not lost forever. They may even prove helpful for a future project.
***
*Please note: Students *must* attend the Ph.D. Application Workshop on March 23 in order to take part in this bootcamp series. See the Draper website for more information on the Ph.D. workshop.*
Session One (Optional): Friday, April 6, 2012: 5:00 – 6:00 PM (Draper Map Room)
Students who cannot attend this session should email Prof. MacPhail directly (tmm260@nyu.edu) so that they will be able to prepare for session two.
Session Two: Friday, April 20, 2012: 6:00 – 8:00 PM (Draper Map Room)
___
So you know that you want to get a Ph.D. You’ve attended the Ph.D. workshop at Draper and you’ve decided that academic life is right for you. Now the real fun begins. . .
You need to put together a great application, an application that sings your praises to admissions committees, that entices them into offering you a great admissions package. But, in order to do that, you have to know a few things first.
This bootcamp is designed for students who know that they want to go on to doctoral study. Over the course of two sessions, we will prepare you for the PhD application process by helping you to get your research proposals in shape. These personal statements are the keystones of your entire application; we can’t stress enough how much they matter to your success in gaining entry to the program(s) of your choice.
In session one of the series, we’ll spend some time discussing what you’ll need to do for session two. In sum, you’ll need to come to session one with some idea of the discipline(s) you’re interested in. You’ll also need to have some idea about the schools/cities/programs in which you can envision yourself for the next 5-7 years of your academic life. Then, we’ll discuss strategy for PhD applications and homework for the next session. WARNING: This is a bootcamp. There will be a large amount of research, prep work, and writing for session two.
In the second session, you will be responsible for bringing a draft of a personal statement with a semi-fleshed out research project to class for work-shopping and peer review. In addition, you must bring a list of your top 5 schools/programs and know which professors you might want to work with – or who might want to work with you – at each school. You should be able to explain the differences among the programs (each school typically has its own approach to the disciplines) and how you’ll craft a slightly different personal statement for each unique program.
Led by Professors Theresa MacPhail and Steven Moga
This workshop is primarily intended for students who are in the early phases of thesis preparation, but also for those at later stages of the process. Students will receive guidance on how to refine their topics and narrow the scope of their theses, and on some of the basic mechanics of writing up their work.
In/coherence: expression, translation, violence
Cultural Social and Political Thought Workshop
University of Victoria: April 21-22, 2012
The Cultural, Social, and Political Thought program at the University of Victoria is pleased to announce a call for papers and projects for our annual graduate conference on April 21-22, 2012. The title of this year’s conference is in/coherence: expression, translation, violence. Thematic workshops will feature keynote speakers and student submissions (papers, performances, art pieces). This interdisciplinary conference seeks to engage in/coherence in social, cultural and political discourses, especially with respect to contemporary events.Dynamics of expression, translation and violence in current contexts present opportunities for discussing in/coherence. As an interpretive thematic, in/coherence can be explored in ways that destabilize the binary reduction of “coherence versus incoherence”. How does in/coherence function politically, socially and culturally in contemporary arenas? Actions viewed as “incoherent” are frequently disregarded as illegitimate, yet claims of “coherent” actions are equally problematic. In response to recent expressions of dissent, a common insistence for actors to “bear reasonable witness” to their choices has illuminated the hegemonic scope of legitimacy. How do both demands and rejections of coherence complicate notions of incoherence (and vice versa)? Discussing in/coherence in these ways has potential ramifications for discussions around citizenship, postcolonialism, democracy, resistance, identity, liberal normativism, gender, nationalism, biopolitics, indigeneity, aesthetics, multiculturalism, the urban, language, globalization, critical theory, posthumanism, and capitalism, among others. We invite participants to submit original projects and aim to foster dynamic debate of these themes.
The conference will offer four workshop foci through which to approach these issues:
Narratives:
Narratives form horizons of consciousness: while they open up some ways of relating, they simultaneously close off the possibility of others. Proposals around this theme explore how the norms of “good,” i.e. coherent, narrative correspond to the dominant ideologies of our time (capitalism, neoliberalism, colonialism and so on). We also look for contributions that address the possibilities for new genres and narratives to reject the norms of efficiency and coherence.
Materialism/Materialities:
Is the material synonymous with the concrete? Can materiality be understood outside of language? Contributions to this workshop might consider the irreducible number of determinations (linguistic, topographical, concrete, etc.) that come into play in discussions of materiality.
Spatiotemporalities:
We are often told that a coherent notion of space and time, and conceptualizations thereof, are fundamentally imbricated in our ability to identify and make ourselves. Homelands and histories are presupposed as the fundamental conditions under which our being together is made and understood. We invite proposals which seek to describe, interrogate and trouble considerations of spaces and times (or spatiotemporalities) imagined as coherent or incoherent, and to call into question the rationalities that mobilize such discourses.
Technologies:
The clean lines and binary choices presented by contemporary technology give the strong impression of clarity, control, and coherence, but under the surface lurk power failures, code exploits, and unexpected mutations. In this spirit, proposals to this workshop might, among other aims, interrogate the in/coherent character of key technologies – questioning the reasons for their design, the way that they function, and the effects that they have on their users – interrogations that may demonstrate that an in/coherent logic informs the algorithmic operation of technology.
Please submit project proposals between 250-500 words (with expression of interest in one of the four workshop nodes) to in.coherence2012@gmail.com by February 10, 2012.
For more information, contact us at in.coherence2012@gmail.com or go to CSPTconference2012.wordpress.The GSAS Master's College presents
Master's Fall Seminar Series: Getting Ready for the Threesis!
Tuesday, November 1st
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
The Bobst Library Graduate Student Exchange, 10th floor
The GSAS Threesis Academic Challenge is an academic competition for masters students where you can compete to win prizes totaling $2500!
The challenge is discussing the work of your research in three minutes or less in accessible language a non-expert can understand.
To help you get ready we are assembling a panel to get you thinking Threesis-style
Join veteran competitors to help you prepare an application and a presentation that is in it to win it.
To register, RSVP with your name and the name of the event to gsas.masterscollege.rsvp@
To request a 2012 GSAS Threesis Academic Challenge Application send an email togsas.threesis@nyu.edu
Ph.D. Application Workshop
Friday, April 29, 5:00 - 7:00 PM
Draper Map Room
Led by Professors Rebecca Colesworthy and Nina Hien
This workshop is a mini-orientation session geared towards students who are either considering a Ph.D. or those who are already in the early stages of the application process. It is also relevant to students who are interested in general information regarding doctoral degrees and those who need some guidance as to what they should be prepared for in terms of the application process. Some general issues that will be tackled are:
Designing Mobility for Democracy: The Role of Cities
NYU's Institute for Public Knowledge
New York University
NYU, Kimmel Center, Eisner & Lubin Auditorium.
60 Washington Sq. New York. 4th Floor
14 April 1:00pm - 5:00pm
"Urban transport is a political and not a technical issue. The technical aspects are very simple. The difficult decisions relate to who is going to benefit from the models adopted."
Enrique Peñalosa, Mayor of Bogota (1998-2001)
The Institute for Public Knowledge at New York University is hosting a half-day workshop on one of the critical dimensions of the contemporary city: mobility. Led by NYU Global Distinguished Professor Ricky Burdett, the open workshop will explore the social, cultural and political aspects of movement and transport systems and how they affect urban inequality. Speakers will discuss how time and space are mediated by a city's 'mobility DNA', and how transport patterns determine access to jobs, social facilities and the public realm. Drawing on recent innovations in transport policy and practice in Cape Town, London, Bogota, Seattle and New York, the workshop will also address the role of governance in making cities fairer and more democratically accountable to its citizens.
Speakers:
- Ricky Burdett, Global Distinguished Professor, NYU and Professor of Urban
Studies, London School of Economics
- Jon Orcutt, Director of Policy, Department of Transportation, City of New
York and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Public Administration, Robert F.
Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University
- Richard Sennett, University Professor of the Humanities, New York
University, and School Professor of Sociology, emeritus, LSE
- Saskia Sassen, Robert S. Lynd Professor of Sociology, Columbia University,
and Co-Chair Committee on Global Thought, Columbia University
- Gerald Frug, Louis D. Brandeis Professor of Law, Harvard University
Edgar Pieterse, Professor, and Director of the African Centre for Cities,
University of Cape Town
- Diane Sugimura, Director of Planning and Development, City of Seattle
- Fabio Casiroli, Professor of Transport Planning, Faculty of Civil
Architecture, Polytechnic of Milan
- Tim Stonor, Loeb Fellowship, Harvard Graduate School of Design, and Managing
Director, Space Syntax Limited
Please RSVP here: https://www.nyu.edu/ipk/events/rsvp.php?eventId=163