Thursday, April 5, 2012
CFP: The Crisis of the Book: Worlds of Opportunity, Worlds of Change (Reed College, Due 6/1)
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Call for Applications: Forum on Forms of Seeing
Forum on Forms of Seeing
CALL FOR NOMINATIONS & APPLICATIONS
Spring 2012
FORUM DESCRIPTIONThe Graduate School of Arts and Science and the Institute of Fine Arts are pleased to invite nominations and applications for a specialized interdisciplinary forum for graduate students whose work addresses modes of visual representation and their products. Focused on the ways in which cultures give form to visual experience, the Forum on Forms of Seeing aims to bring together students from a wide range of graduate programs. Applications are encouraged from students who have strong historical and/or theoretical interests in images and visuality in the broadest sense, and who wish to become closely familiar with other disciplines concerned with visual representation.
Over the past few decades, many disciplines have become interested in “visuality” as a wider natural and cultural phenomenon that includes not only the traditional fine arts but imaging practices of all kinds, from cinema and popular print culture to digital reality techniques and scientific modeling. Anthropology, Philosophy, History, Literary Criticism, Psychoanalysis, and Neuroscience have taken significant interest in the concept of the visual, and relatively young disciplines such as Cinema Studies and Visual Studies or Visual Culture put visual representation at the center of their research. Art History itself has become more cognizant of the limitations of traditional medium-bound definitions of the image, and has taken up a more fluidly-defined visuality as one of its central problems. Reflecting the dramatic expansion of visuality as a category for scholarly inquiry, the Forum invites applications for membership from any NYU graduate program.
How images in different periods and cultures imitate, model, render, or critique the world and our visual apprehension of it, for their makers and for their viewers, will be of central interest to the Forum. This historical and comparative approach may profitably be complemented by a philosophical understanding of the image as record of, or model for, acts of seeing. The creation, dissemination, function, signification, efficacy, duration, destruction, and demise of images will be welcome topics for the Forum.
MEETING FORMATMembership in the Forum on Forms of Seeing will be for one academic year, commencing in September 2012 and ending in April 2013. All eight members will present and critique work in progress during monthly, moderated lunch sessions, scheduled on Fridays, from 12–3 p.m., at Washington Square and the Institute of Fine Arts. The meetings will culminate in a one-day event at the end of the semester, showcasing the year’s presentations. Members are expected to attend every session and to participate in the end-of-year symposium. A stipend of $500 is distributed per semester.
APPLICATION PROCEDURETo apply for membership in the 2012-13 Forum on Forms of Seeing, please provide a one-page statement of your scholarly interest in visual representation and the relevance of interdisciplinary debate about visuality for your graduate work. Your application should include a current transcript (unofficial is fine), CV, and a recommendation by a NYU faculty member. Please submit your completed application electronically by end-of-day Monday, May 7 to Anna Antoniak (anna.antoniak@nyu.edu).
For more information, please visit the Forum on Forms of Seeing blog at blogs.nyu.edu/blogs/bms247/
Applicants are encouraged to attend this year’s symposium on Friday, April 27 (4-7 PM) at 7 East 12th Street, Rm 321.
IFA-GSAS Forum on Forms of Seeing Annual Symposium: 4/27
IFA-GSAS Forum on Forms of Seeing Annual Symposium
Friday, April 27, 2012 // 7 East 12 Street, Rm 321 // 4-7 PM
The Forum on Forms of Seeing is a specialized interdisciplinary forum for graduate students whose work addresses modes of visual representation and their products. Join us on Friday, April 27th for a series of brief presentations. Reception to follow for the (re)launch of the Forum’s online presence.
Scheduled Presentations
Reception to Follow
DENA A. AL‐ADEEB [Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, GSAS]
Transnational and Transdisciplinary Turns In Contemporary West‐Asian & North African Art
BLANCA DE LA VÁLGOMA [Institute of Fine Arts, GSAS]
Seeing a Portrait as They Saw It: Towards a Visual Culture of Seventeenth‐Century Spain
LEE ELIZABETH DOUGLAS [Anthropology, GSAS]
Photographing Forensics: Art, Science & the Politics of Visual Evidence in Post‐Dictatorship Argentina & Spain
Protecting the Muses: The League of Nations and Cultural Heritage Policy
Inscribing Turkishness: Alphabet and National Identity
Fake Blood and Queer Belonging
Maori Media in the 21st Century
Clark Coolidge’s Dialogic Poetry: Polaroid and Smithsonian Depositions
Racial Signification in Young Jean Lee’s LEAR: A Surface Reading
For more information about last year’s event, please visit
blogs.nyu.edu/blogs/bms247/forumonformsofseeing/
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Reminder: CFP - Shift: Graduate Journal of Visual and Material Culture
We would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone of an open call for submissions to the fourth issue of Shift, set to be launched 01 October 2011. Shift welcomes academic papers, as well as exhibition and book reviews, dealing with visual and material culture from graduate students in any discipline in the humanities. Papers may address a full range of topics and historical periods.
All manuscripts should be sent by email to editors@shiftjournal.org by 01 April 2011.
For further details and submission guidelines please see the journal website at http://www.shiftjournal.org/callforpapers.htm.
--
Veronica Carter and Steve Marti
Co-editors
Shift: Graduate Journal of Visual and Material Culture
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
CFP: Photography, Gender, & the Politics of Representation (Princeton, Due 3/1)
An Interdisciplinary Symposium
Princeton University, April 22-23, 2011
The past decade has witnessed widespread institutional and scholarly efforts to historicize the relation between art and feminism, and between art and identity politics. These efforts unfold in a present that is often characterized as “post-gender” and/or “post-racial.” Just as categories of identity seem to lose traction in cultural discourse, so boundaries between artistic media become unfixed. Yet photographic representation is increasingly pervasive, and increasingly bound to the performance of subjectivity.
This symposium aims to consider the interrelated production of gender and photography, along with their dissolution as stable categories of inquiry. An interrogation of photography today requires looking within as well as beyond the boundaries of traditional art-historical frameworks. It compels us to account for the political and social dimensions in which photography participates, and demands that we re-consider the mise-en-scène of photography’s production as art.
How has the evolution of photography—from b/w to color, from analogue to digital, from mass media to social media—served to articulate or blur aesthetic and subjective differences? What politics of representation emerge when the individual can be both agent and object of photographic voyeurism, exhibitionism, and surveillance? Might photography's expanded field offer the potential for reshaping feminist politics today?
We invite participants to explore historical, existing and possible relationships between photography and the (re)production of gender, from the perspectives of visual culture, philosophy, (art) history, and art practice. Papers might consider photography in relation to:
gender bending - histories and politics of sexuality - performance and/or portraiture - the construction of masculinity - women artists - representations of gender, race, and class - advocacy, activism, and political practice - feminist politics, ethics, and aesthetics - medical and biological discourses - capitalism, terrorism, and war
We welcome submissions from graduate students and emerging scholars in all fields and disciplines. Please submit a CV and 300-word abstract for a 20-minute paper by March 1, 2011 to Frances Jacobus-Parker, Elena Peregrina-Salvador, and Mareike Stoll at princetonphotography2011@gmail.com.
Call for Papers: Graduate Journal of Visual and Material Culture (Due 4/1)
We would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone of an open call for submissions to the fourth issue of Shift, set to be launched 01 October 2011. Shift welcomes academic papers, as well as exhibition and book reviews, dealing with visual and material culture from graduate students in any discipline in the humanities. Papers may address a full range of topics and historical periods.
All manuscripts should be sent by email to editors@shiftjournal.org by 01 April 2011. For further details and submission guidelines please see the attached call for papers or the journal website at http://www.shiftjournal.org/callforpapers.htm.
--
Veronica Carter and Steve Marti
Co-editors
Shift: Graduate Journal of Visual and Material Culture
Monday, January 24, 2011
Wojnarowicz Screening & Panel, Co-Organized by Draper Student: Feb. 1
***
A Fire in Our Belly: Film Screening and Panel Discussion
Artist David Wojnarowicz’s archives are housed at Fales Library and Special Collections on the third floor of Bobst Library at NYU, and the film ‘A Fire in My Belly,’ an edited version of which the National Portrait Gallery removed from its exhibition ‘Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture,’ was on loan from Fales.
This event brings together members of the NYU community to address the myriad and ongoing issues raised by the censoring of this important work.
Reception to follow
Please visit our Facebook event listing to RSVP:
http://www.facebook.com/#!/event.php?eid=183963461625645
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Call for Papers: Producing History through Mad Men (Invisible Culture E-Journal, U Rochester)
CALL FOR PAPERS
Please distribute widely
“Where Do You Want Me to Start?” Producing History through Mad Men
Guest Editors: Amanda Graham and Erin Leary
The television network AMC’s historical drama Mad Men, set in 1960-64, premiered in 2007. While the program was slowly accepted by audiences, at least as slowly as its methodical narrative structures, it clearly struck a chord among a cross-generational body of viewers, tripling in size from the first season. In order to engage with the show more fully, fans paraded in Mad Men-inspired costumes during Banana Republic-sponsored events in 2009 and 2010 in Times Square, “Mad Men-ed” themselves online, participated in the series’ Facebook page or the network’s online portals, downloaded period music, or simply watched each episode. The show is a pervasive cultural force within the media landscape, but why does this program—which is situated several decades in the past—have such saliency today? How and why do viewers relate to these characters? How does Mad Men impact our understanding of current socio-cultural environment? How does our contemporary cultural landscape inform how we read Mad Men?
When Mad Men entered into American living rooms, viewers’ lives were characterized by prosperity. One year later, in 2008, America’s nightmares were realized: widespread bankruptcy and home foreclosures occurred, unidentifiable villains and incomprehensible wars became the norm, rhetorics of socialism and communism were brandished by various political factions, racial tensions resurfaced, and technological angst became a part of citizens’ everyday realities and prompted them to question the American dream. These anxieties mirror those of the postwar era in which Mad Men is set and traverse the spacio-temporal boundaries demarcating one period from the other.
Simultaneously, Mad Men asks the viewer to question social progress. When Don Draper and his family leave trash from a family picnic on park grounds, viewers may feel momentarily superior. When Peggy Olson is embarrassed to declare her pregnancy in the workplace, viewers could experience a sense of self-congratulatory modernity. Yet, self-reflective viewers are as likely to wonder if much has actually changed. Highlighting these disjunctures and the functions of history encourages viewers to realize the wisdom of Don’s assertion that, “Change isn’t good or bad. It just happens.”
Why are fans so obsessed with Mad Men? Why this particular show? What does it mean to want to live in Mad Men or be in Mad Men? Do the parallels between the nineteen-sixties (as interpreted by Mad Men) and the events of our contemporary moment serve to enhance our understandings of either era? Does the show’s depiction of the postwar period function as a site of nostalgia by virtue of its status as a present-day consumer product? Or does it perform the productive functions of the outmoded? Are these categories fruitful modes of analysis? How do they position this particular object for a multi-generational audience?
Possible avenues for evaluation include, but are not limited to:
Narration
Considering the literary content of Mad Men—books, poems, etc. featured in conjunction with character development;
The symbolism in the music of Mad Men;
Influences of Hitchcock and the imagery of the falling man;
Relationships to other television programs, films, art works, and political events in our contemporary media/culturalscape
Consumption
Parallels in the relationships between the modern subject and consumption; baby boom, postwar affluence – industry related to death of industry economy – outsourced labor?
Design, broadly encompassed to include architecture, fashion, interiors, graphic design;
Product placement, historical and contemporary;
Advertising analysis;
Environmentalism;
Viewer reception;
Technology (as reflected in the show, and as a mechanism for the show’s distribution)
Identity
Political consciousness and sexual awakening/promiscuity (male/female, gay/straight, pre/extra-marital);
Playing Yourself: Alter egos and virtuality;
class passing narratives;
The representation of homosexuality on screen and historically;
Motherhood; fatherhood
Infertility and class;
Questions of nationalism;
Character/actor “metatext” crossover to other shows/news
We solicit articles from a wide array of disciplines, including communication studies and anthropology, film and media studies, women’s studies, literary criticism, music theory and history, as well as critical race studies and cultural studies generally defined.
Please send inquiries and completed papers (MLA style) of between 2,500 and 5,000 words to Amanda Graham (agraham9[at]mail[dot]rochester[dot]edu) and Erin Leary (eleary2[at]mail[dot]rochester[dot]edu) by March 1, 2011.
Invisible Culture is also currently seeking submissions for book and exhibition reviews (600-1000 words). To submit book or exhibition review proposals, please email ivcbookreviews[at]gmail[dot]com. For a list of reviewable titles, see: http://www.rochester.edu/in_visibile_culture/Reviews/review_copies.html.
**********
Invisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to explorations of the material and political dimensions of cultural practices: the means by which cultural objects and communities are produced, the historical contexts in which they emerge, and the regimes of knowledge or modes of social interaction to which they contribute.
http://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/
Monday, December 6, 2010
Message from Draper Student Emily Colucci Re: David Wojnarowicz and NYU
Draper student Emily Colucci has shared the following email with us in response to the recent censorship of David Wojnarowicz's piece "A Fire in My Belly" at the National Portrait Gallery. Emily would like to see this situation addressed directly within the NYU community (the artist's papers are housed in the Fales Collection in Bobst) and is seeking suggestions and feedback from the Draper community. Any suggestions and/or comments should be sent to Emily directly at esc255[at]nyu[dot]edu. Her message is below.
***
“To place an object or writing that contains what it invisible because of legislation or social taboo into an environment outside myself makes me feel not so alone; it keeps me company by virtue of its existence. It is kind of like a ventriloquist’s dummy—the only difference is that the work can speak for itself or act like that ‘magnet’ to attract others who carried this enforced silence. It also could act as a magnet for those with opposing frames of reference…”—David Wojnarowicz
On the night before World AIDS Day, the Smithsonian Institution’s National Portrait Gallery in Washington D.C. removed a video entitled “A Fire in My Belly” by New York artist David Wojnarowicz from their exhibition “Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture,” an exhibition on sexual difference in modern America, after pressure from the Catholic League and House Republicans John Boehner and Eric Cantor. The Catholic League and the House members took offense to an 11 second clip in the video, which depicts a small crucifix being crawled on by ants. Catholic League president William Donohue called the video “hate speech” and Rep. John Boehner decried it as a misuse of taxpayer money. Bowing to these criticisms and the threatening of their taxpayer funds, the National Portrait Gallery removed the film from their exhibition, closely mirroring the Robert Mapplethorpe controversy in 1989.
David Wojnarowicz created “A Fire in My Belly” in 1987 in response to his lover and artistic mentor Peter Hujar’s death from AIDS-related illnesses and his own rage at the silence surrounding the AIDS crisis. Wojnarowicz, who died of AIDS-related illnesses five years later in 1992, often worked with difficult or challenging images as a means to articulate his invisibility and the invisibility of other people with AIDS during the late 1980s and 1990s.
David Wojnarowicz’s archives are housed at Fales Library and Special Collections on the Third floor of Bobst Library at NYU and the full-length video, which the National Portrait Gallery cut for exhibition was on loan from Fales. With this connection to NYU and the issues it raises for queer politics, art history and other fields, I feel that something should be done at NYU to address these issues whether it be a reading of Wojnarowicz’s work, a lecture or a discussion about the issues such as freedom of expression, hate speech, and the memory and history of the AIDS crisis, raised by the censoring of this video.
Please let me know any suggestions you may have. I know it is a bad time coming at the end of the Fall semester but with the issues raised by this controversy, a discussion of David Wojnarowicz’s artistic and literary output seems necessary.
Some important links on the Wojnarowicz/National Portrait Gallery controversy:
-PPOW Gallery holds Wojnarowicz’s Estate and has provided the uncut “A Fire in My Belly” film:
http://www.ppowgallery.com/index.php
-Articles on the National Portrait Gallery’s removal of “A Fire in My Belly”:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/30/AR2010113006801.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/arts/design/02portrait.html
-Support Hide/Seek, a Facebook group with frequent updates and news about responses to this controversy:
http://www.facebook.com/#!/support.hide.seek
-David Wojnarowicz himself discussing art funding:
Thanks and I look forward to hearing your suggestions.
Best,
Emily Colucci
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
NYU Visual Culture in Italy and Germany conference
after Dictatorship and War
April 8-9, 2010
New York University
Casa Italiana Zerilli-Marimò
Department of Italian Studies and Deutsches Haus
Conference Themes
This symposium examines visual culture in Italy and Germany in the years of transition from dictatorship and World War Two. This period, roughly 1945 to 1955, has often been treated through the lens of forward-looking Cold War historiographies that reflect an investment in 1945 as a “year zero.” The symposium will reflect the newest research in this direction, but will consider how visual culture also expressed experiences of loss, disorientation, and victimization brought on by war and the end of dictatorship in Germany and Italy. Visual culture in particular can be a privileged source for the exploration of the dramatic contrasts between idealism and despair that marked this complex period in both Italian and German history. The tensions between processes of unmaking and remaking a national past, set within a broader context of the negotiation of American and other foreign influences, figure heavily in Italian and German visual culture of the period.
FEATURING: Angela Dalle Vacche, Noa Steimatsky, Erica Carter, Massimo Perinelli, Ara H. Merjian, Lara Pucci, Sabine Eckmann, Emily Braun, Ulrich Baer, Antonella Pelizzari, Andrés Mario Zervigón, Andreas Huyssen
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION http://italian.as.nyu.edu/page/newsevents
Thursday, February 18, 2010
February 13 - April 4, 2010Exhibition Curated by Draper Alum Patrick Grenier ('04)
Since the middle of the 19th century artists have imagined utopian worlds and hoped to create new aesthetic forms for a peaceful society. This optimistic attitude continues despite post-modern rhetoric and global terrorism. Glimpses of this positive force were seen in President Obama’s 2008 campaign. The exhibition will investigate how artists use delusional optimism and senselessness through performance and interactive works to sustain hope. A public program, including films and music, will delve into historical moments when the odds against freedom, equality and justice were unimaginable.
Featuring artwork by:
Sarah Anderson
Daniel Bejar
Douglas Boatwright
Joseph Borelli
Mike Calway-Fagen
Zoe Chan
Jinkee Choi
Tim Clifford
Johannes DeYoung
William Graef
Tobin Hines
Tom Hughes
James Jaxxa
Jayson Keeling
Tina Laporta
Sarah McCann
Anne MacGuire
Mustafa Maluka
Yoko Ono
Tattfoo Tan
Cody Vanderkay
On display at the
Snug Harbor Cultural Center and Botanical Garden
Newhouse Center for Contemporary Art
1000 Richmond Terrace, Staten Island
http://www.snug-harbor.org/newhouse.html
Monday, October 12, 2009
Lecture Series: Rethinking Transnational Processes: Talk, 10/23
A Center for International Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences Presents:
NYU-CNRS 2009-2010 Lecture Series
Rethinking Transnational Processes
and Multiple Modernities in the Atlantic World
October 23, 2009
2 - 4 pm, 4 Washington Square North, Conference room, 2nd floor
Roger Sansi
(Goldsmiths College, University of London)
"Images" are a problem in the Afro-Brazilian religion Candomblé in two senses. First, the presence of Catholic images in altars has been questioned by the "reafricanization" movement in the last decades, as a form of "syncretism". Second it is often said that taking pictures or videos of rituals is not allowed. However, in my ethnographic experience, both religious images, pictures, and videos are used in many Candomblé houses. How can we understand this contradiction? What is the problem with images in Candomblé after all? To answer this question, we will have to examine the transformation of the practices and notions of "representation" within Candomblé itself, as a result of the incorporation of the modern discourse of "culture" by Afro-Brazilian elites.
Roger Sansi (PhD University of Chicago 2003) is Lecturer in Anthropology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. He works on Afro-Brazilian religion and culture and international contemporary art. His recent publications include Fetishes and Monuments. Afro-Brazilian art and Culture in the 20th century (Berghahn Books, 2007) and Sorcery in the Black Atlantic, coedited with Luis Nicolau Parés (University of Chicago Press, in press).
Contacts:
Stefania Capone, scl350@nyu.edu
Aisha Khan, ak105@nuy.edu
Transitions
4 Washington Square North New York NY 10003 212-992-7488
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Call for Papers: The Cultural Visualization of Hurricane Katrina
Invisible Culture: A Journal For Visual Culture
Deadline for Papers: October 15, 2009
Guest Editors: Nicola Mann and Victoria Pass, University of Rochester
The Cultural Visualization of Hurricane Katrina
Over the past four years, various forms of visual media have focused their lenses on the swathes of watery land that make up the Mississippi delta. Since Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in summer of 2005, the region and its residents have been subject to intense televisual, filmic, artistic, and media-based scrutiny. From Geraldo Rivera’s tearful live reports from the Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, to Kanye West’s frustrated declaration at the NBC Concert for Hurricane Relief that “George Bush doesn’t care about black people,” to the widely acclaimed documentary film Trouble the Water (2008), images of the hurricane, the people it affected (and continues to affect), and the land it ravaged have been projected into our living rooms through a series of visual representations.
Much of the scholarship on this topic has focused on socio-cultural issues including rebuilding strategies, the failure of homeland security, and testimonial accounts of “survivors” or “witnesses.” This issue aims to analyze representations of Katrina and its aftermath using the methodologies of visual and cultural studies. We are interested in the ways that analyses of the politics of representation, as exemplified in the case of Katrina, opens up into a discussion the evolution of visual and cultural studies in the last ten or twenty years.
We seek papers that consider visual representations of Hurricane Katrina in a ways unimaginable at earlier points in the intersection between visual studies and cultural studies. From CNN.com’s award winning “Voices from the Gulf Coast” podcasts, to the various discussion blogs that have emerged in the wake of the event, to Google Earth’s satellite imagery overlays of the devastation in the affected region, to the television show “Extreme Makeover: Hurricane Katrina Home Edition,” we have seen in Katrina’s aftermath a plethora of new modes of visual diffusion. Furthermore, the intensification of mass media, both in terms of the sheer quantity of media outlets and in the reach of its dissemination, has given rise to a new experience of historical time and geographic proximity, in which we experience historical events through media representations almost immediately as they happen and regardless of where they occur.
Additionally, the interactivity of new media has reoriented the producer/consumer binary of traditional media. We are interested in the representational politics of these new visual rhetorics and in the new and often hybrid apparatuses through which we experience them. For example, a critical alternative to the mainstream news media’s coverage of Hurricane Katrina arose across multiple platforms. When compared to more “traditional” documentary forms of disaster representation such the Associated Press’ controversial global dissemination of “looting” photographs, does the immediacy and interactive nature of new media responses render their vision more absolute, real, and perhaps most importantly, “true”?
Is the semiotic approach of, for example, Roland Barthes on photography—which arose in relation to a very different mode of cultural production—still relevant? Can the even earlier model of Frankfurt School-style ideology critique help us to understand popular culture and its capacity for social change? How might these now-familiar methodologies be refashioned for the current culture? Or what methods have eclipsed them? One key concern of this issue is whether technological shifts and advancements in the dissemination of media over the past twenty years have changed the way we see beyond the recognition of our interpretive paradigms. If the object of visual studies has changed, how might we adapt the discipline to engage with the current mode(s) of cultural production?
Accepted essays will accompany the transcript of an upcoming roundtable discussion between the founders of the Graduate Program in Visual and Cultural Studies at the University of Rochester’s co-founders, on the occasion of the program’s twentieth anniversary (Mieke Bal, Norman Bryson, Michael Ann Holly, Kaja Silverman, Constance Penley, and Janet Wolff; moderated by Douglas Crimp).
Possible avenues for the exploration include, but are not limited to:
Films:
-The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008)
- Trouble the Water (2008)
-When the Levees Broke (2008), Spike Lee
-Hellp, Darren Martinez
Blogs:
New Orleans Ladder
The Survival of New Orleans weblog
Nola blog
Televisual depictions of the hurricane and responses to it, for example:
-news coverage of “looting”
-Comic Relief (2006)
-House (May 16, 2006), FOX
-Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, “The Christmas Show,” (Dec. 4, 2006)
-The Daily Show
Artistic responses to Hurricane Katrina:
Prospect 1: New Orleans (international biennial)
News photographs
“Remembering Katrina,” the official Hurricane Katrina souvenir program.
Mainstream news journalism
Urban renewal efforts
Personal photographs
NOLA:
NOLA tourism
The disappearance of “authentic” indigenous NOLA culture
NOLA outside of Bourbon Street
Representations of local culture in New Orleans
Please send inquiries and completed papers (MLA style) of 2,500 – 5,000 words to Nicola Mann (nmann2[at]mail[dot]rochester[dot]edu) and Victoria Pass (vpass[at]mail[dot]rochester[dot]edu) by October 15, 2009.
In Visible Culture is also currently seeking submissions for book and exhibition
reviews (600-1000 words). To submit book or exhibition review proposals please email ivcbookreviews[at]gmail[dot]com. For a list of reviewable titles, see:
http://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/Reviews/review_copies.html
***********
Invisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture is a peer-reviewed
journal dedicated to explorations of the material and political dimensions of
cultural practices: the means by which cultural objects and communities are
produced, the historical contexts in which they emerge, and the regimes of
knowledge or modes of social interaction to which they contribute.
http://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/
